E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Khatri, Indiras; Amar, Jacques G.
Thin solid films, 03/2020, Letnik: 697Journal Article
•Deposition on the (111) surface leads to a significant excess Te sticking probability.•Deposition on the (100) surface leads to much smaller excess Te sticking probability.•Deposition on the (100) surface leads to interstitials in the surface layer. Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) is an important material for the production of high-efficiency thin-film solar cells. While sputter deposition has been used to create CdTe-based solar cells, two other important methods of growth are close-spaced sublimation and vapor deposition. In these methods, the depositing clusters correspond to Cd atoms and Te2 dimers while the deposition energies are relatively low. In addition, depending on vapor pressure, deposition method, and target-substrate distance, deposition may occur at relatively large angles with respect to the substrate normal. Here we investigate the dependence of the attachment probability and deposition site for Cd and Te2 clusters deposited on Cd-terminated and Te-terminated (100) and (111) surfaces of zincblende CdTe on deposition conditions. In general, we find that the deposition of Cd atoms and/or Te2 dimers on the oppositely terminated surface leads to an attachment probability which is close to 1 and relatively independent of deposition conditions for both the (100) and (111) orientations. In contrast, deposition on the same terminated surface leads to a significantly lower attachment probability which generally decreases with increasing deposition angle, energy, and substrate temperature. Our results also indicate that deposition on the (111) surface leads to a significant excess Te sticking probability. In contrast, the excess Te attachment probability for deposition on the (100) surface is typically significantly smaller, and in some cases may even be negative. We also find, for both deposition on the (111) surface as well as opposite termination deposition on the (100) surface, that the dominant deposition mode corresponds to sitting on top of the surface which corresponds to growth of the next layer. In contrast, for same termination deposition on the (100) surface the dominant deposition mode corresponds to joining the first layer. These results imply that even for low deposition energies and substrate temperatures, deposition on the (100) surface is likely to create interstitials in the surface layer.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.