UP - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Nonpharmacological Lipoprot...
    van Wijk, Diederik F., MD; Sjouke, Barbara, MD; Figueroa, Amparo, MD; Emami, Hamed, MD; van der Valk, Fleur M., MD; MacNabb, Megan H., BA; Hemphill, Linda C., MD; Schulte, Dominik M., MD, PhD; Koopman, Marion G., MD, PhD; Lobatto, Mark E., MD; Verberne, Hein J., MD, PhD; Fayad, Zahi A., MD, PhD; Kastelein, John J.P., MD, PhD; Mulder, Willem J.M., PhD; Hovingh, G. Kees, MD, PhD; Tawakol, Ahmed, MD; Stroes, Erik S.G., MD, PhD

    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10/2014, Letnik: 64, Številka: 14
    Journal Article

    Abstract Background Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are characterized by elevated atherogenic lipoprotein particles, predominantly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which is associated with accelerated atherogenesis and increased cardiovascular risk. Objectives This study used18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18 FDG-PET) to investigate whether arterial inflammation is higher in patients with FH and, moreover, whether lipoprotein apheresis attenuates arterial wall inflammation in FH patients. Methods In total, 38 subjects were recruited: 24 FH patients and 14 normolipidemic controls. All subjects underwent FDG-PET imaging at baseline. Twelve FH patients who met the criteria for lipoprotein apheresis underwent apheresis procedures followed by a second FDG-PET imaging 3 days (range 1 to 4 days) after apheresis. Subsequently, the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of FDG uptake within the arterial wall was assessed. Results In FH patients, the mean arterial TBR was higher compared with healthy controls (2.12 ± 0.27 vs. 1.92 ± 0.19; p = 0.03). A significant correlation was observed between baseline arterial TBR and LDL-C (R = 0.37; p = 0.03) that remained significant after adjusting for statin use (β = 0.001; p = 0.02) and atherosclerosis risk factors (β = 0.001; p = 0.03). LDL-C levels were significantly reduced after lipoprotein apheresis (284 ± 118 mg/dl vs. 127 ± 50 mg/dl; p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction of arterial inflammation after lipoprotein apheresis (TBR: 2.05 ± 0.31 vs. 1.91 ± 0.33; p < 0.02). Conclusions The arterial wall of FH patients is characterized by increased inflammation, which is markedly reduced after lipoprotein apheresis. This lends support to a causal role of apoprotein B–containing lipoproteins in arterial wall inflammation and supports the concept that lipoprotein-lowering therapies may impart anti-inflammatory effects by reducing atherogenic lipoproteins.